 |
During the l950s Lahner exhibited on an irregular
basis, claiming that it was "for those who come after us to judge our
work."[91] Among the opportunities the public had
of seeing his work were two well-received shows (1950 and 1953) at the
prestigious Galerie Jeanne Castel.[92] The l950 exhibition,
sponsored by Marcel Sauvage, contained not only oil paintings, but also
drawings, watercolors, gouaches, and pastels. Sauvage also wrote the preface
to the catalogue of the exhibition and remarked upon the naive quality
of the painter's oeuvre, comparing it at times to "the art of fresco
or stained glass" and at other times to sculpture.[93]
One perspicacious critic detected a science in Lahner's method, that of
"elimination by way of substitution," a kind of latent symbolism present
in even his most realistic compositions.[94]
After
several visits to Africa Lahner was asked in l955 by the Averseng family
to design a chapel for the town of El Affroun, where the family owned
property and Jack Averseng was mayor.[95] Lahner also
made oil maquettes for the chapel's stained-glass windows, which were
executed by Raphael Lardeur.[96] In this assignment
Lahner took part in the near-mania for chapel construction and decoration
in France during the l950s: Picasso at Vallauris; Matisse for the design
and stained glass at the Dominican Chapelle du Rosaire at Vence; Jean
Cocteau for the frescoes on the interior of the fishermen's chapel, Saint-Pierre,
in Villefranche; Rouault for the church windows in Plateau d'Assy (Haute-Savoie);
Léger for the windows in Sacre-Coeur, Audincourt (Doubs); and Chagall
for stained glass in the cathedrals of Metz, Reims, and Rouen.[97]
Benefiting from some of these prototypes, Lahner decided upon a small
white-washed structure not unlike the Matisse chapel at Vence. In the
El Affroun chapel there is, however, a clerestory of stained glass running
along the upper portion of the walls rather than one large window as Matisse
had devised for Vence. Whereas Matisse took advantage of a southern exposure
to flood his chapel with light, Lahner seems to have purposely chosen
to keep the illumination subdued. Other than the clerestory there are
no windows in the building. In this respect, Lahner's chapel resembles
a mosque more than a Christian church: with the light source from on high
and sombre obscurity below, the effect is mystical and oriental.
There
seems to be a certain Eastern mysticism in Lahner's stained-glass designs
as well, although this may also derive from his natural talent for synthetic
form and surface pattern. While all the windows illustrate Christian themes,
they do so iconically and there is no narrative cycle. Similarly, the
forms of the saints and holy beasts depicted are abstracted to the point
that it is not always immediately clear what they represent.[98]
This may be less true, however, for the windows, where the glass particles
respond to the intensity of the light, than for the edition of hand-colored
woodblock prints of the windows that Lahner issued after the chapel's
completion.[99] In deference to the local Islamic
culture with its abhorrence of idolatry, Lahner appears to have wanted
to suggest Christian beliefs rather than spell them out.
The
chapel is dedicated to Saint Martina (Sainte-Martienne), an obscure early
Christian martyr who was miraculously spared by a lion.[100]
The moment of her salvation is depicted in one of the chapel windows,
her rigid but passive figure in a purple robe yielding to the more active
mass of yellow representing the attacking lion. Neither the lion nor Sainte-Martienne
possesses any individual character; it is through the contrast of active
and passive forms, complemented by their respective light and dark tones,
that Lahner tells his story. The lion appears in another window looking
rather like the Babylonian relief Lahner probably intended it to, but
Christianized by its representation in light-admitting glass. Rather unexpectedly,
Saint-Louis also makes an appearance in another window, reminding us that
in l955 Algeria was still a département of France.
Some
of the other stained-glass scenes are immediately recognizable: Christ
on the cross, the miraculous draught of fishes, the lamb of God, and a
dove representing the Holy Spirit. Less easy to discern are the figure
with a nimbus entitled Jésus enfant, symbole de départ
de l'ère chrétien, and that of La Vièrge glorieuse,
clothed in green and enthroned. Unfortunately, the chapel of Sainte-Martienne
had a short life as a religious monument. After Algeria won its independence,
the church was deconsecrated and now serves as a maison du peuple
or community house for the people of El Affroun.[101]
The
success of these religious designs encouraged Lahner to make explicit
reference to the organizing principles of stained-glass composition in
his oil paintings. A few of these paintings follow closely the forms and
subject matter of the El Affroun windows, but the best of them are new
variations on that theme, incorporating Lahner's long-held practices of
organizing space in paintings with a sort of double-entendre symbolism.
Sainte-Marthe is a nude form stylized to conform to the stained-glass
aesthetic. The figure of the saint appears surrounded by several zones
of yellow light, creating an aureole around her head and torso as with
the figure of Jesus enfant from El Affroun. The black lines, thinner
in the painting than in the window designs -- and therefore more like
Lahner's oils -- run diagonally and at right angles. There are also quite
a few curvaceous lines in the human and animal forms which soften the
geometry and make a distinction between animate and inanimate form. This
distinction is reiterated in the use of flesh tones for the saint's body
and a gray/brown fur color for the dog, opposed to the more brilliant
tones of the colored blocks resembling glass. Despite her sanctity, Saint
Martha is portrayed as an exalted but still decidedly human being. Some
of the spaces defined by the lines contain one solid color, but many others
contain two or more colors bleeding into one another. The palette is composed
mostly of lighter colors as if the sun were radiating from below the picture
surface. Painted in l956 and thus immediately after the installation of
the windows in the chapel, Sainte-Marthe is an amalgam of religious
imagery and stained-glass design. It also serves as an example of the
somewhat more conventional methods of pictorial construction that Lahner
had been practicing since the l930s.
This conflation of old and new styles and imagery
is even more apparent in Jeanne d'Arc , also known as La Bergère,
from about the same period as Sainte-Marthe. The background is
divided into three principal zones of color, the primaries red, blue,
and green, against which a figure, virtually identical with Lahner's many
images of peasant women, stands with arms outstretched. The
viewer is immediately aware -- provided that he knows both titles of the
painting -- that Lahner is characterizing Joan in terms of her peasant
origins and that he is representing her with her arm raised upward at
the moment of her enlightenment. Again, Lahner uses yellow (here a sort
of mustard tone) to draw attention to the central figure, yellow being
the lightest color in the spectrum and therefore the one that admits the
most light. The combination of red, green, and blue pointedly summons
the memory of countless stained-glass windows in the churches and cathedrals
of northern France.
In
La Colombe, Lahner makes the same analogy between physical form
and spiritual symbolism. The white dove may be taken for what it appears
to be or as an emblem of the Holy Spirit. Similarly, one can take the
picture either as a flat surface of lines and colors or as a stained-glass
design. This dichotomy is equally apparent in the painter's Self-Portrait
from about the same period where the artist appears, palette in hand,
against a stained-glass-inspired background divided into zones of red
and yellow. We have seen touches of ambiguity in some of Lahner's previous
work, but mostly in a rather playful sense. With the addition of religious
iconography to his repertoire of images, Lahner discovered a means of
giving his subjects two-fold significance in a sharper, polarized way.
The viewer is given the option of taking these paintings on either the
physical or the spiritual level of meaning, or as an artist might, in
terms of reality and illusion. As in most of his work Lahner continues
to withhold his thoughts on the subject, merely proposing alternatives.
Footnotes
-
(91) 91 E. Lahner, in
Barotte 1950.
(92) Bouret 115.
(93) M. Sauvage, in
Emile Lahner. Oeuvres anciennes et récentes , 1950.
(94) Barotte 1950.
(95) See J. Trichet
and P. MacOrlan, Projets de vitraux d'Emile Lahner , Paris
1955.
(96) Ibid.
(97) In most instances,
the new chapels and their decorations were commissioned as war memorials,
or in the case of Chagall's stained glass for the cathedrals, as
replacements for art work destroyed in the war.
(98) A. de Faigairolle,
"L'Église d'El Affroun va inaugurer les vitraux d'Emile Lahner,"
L'Afrique Républicaine , January 1956. A similar process
can be seen in Lahner's landscape paintings of the same period in
which a few forms and their spatial organization are used to indicate
the subject in a summary fashion.
(99) Trichet and MacOrlan
1955.
(100) One of the many
ordeals Saint Martina endured was the mauling by a lion in a Roman
amphitheater. At the last moment, rather than devour her, the lion
simply lay down at her feet. See L. Réau, Iconographie de
l'art chrétien , Paris 1958, III, 918-919.
(101) Conversation
with Jérôme Treuttel, 1 November 1987.
|
 |